The Aussies enforce fiber for new builds

If a government is determined to get a (fiber-based) Next Generation Network in its country it should take the necessary steps. Talk is cheap, actions speak loudly.
The Aussies give the right example. The Australian Government has introduced a bill which effectively enforces (with penalties) fiber access networks for new buildings. Not just greenfields but all types of new developments, including greenfield (broadacre) estates, urban infill and urban renewal projects.  Its either fiber with open access provisions, or a “fibre-ready facility” with open access.
The Bill will apply whether the real estate development project is intended to 
establish building lots, or building units, or both, for either sale or lease.  The fibre 
connection requirement will not apply to lines that are not intended to provide a 
carriage service to the public (e.g. it will not apply to private networks) or that are not 
wholly or primarily for use by an end-user at the end user’s premises (e.g. it will not 
apply to a line connecting to a mobile phone tower).

To ensure that carriers are able to gain access to the fibre-ready facilities installed in 
accordance with the fibre-ready infrastructure requirement, the Bill provides for the 
establishment in later regulations of an access regime that would require third party 
access to those facilities to be given. 

And they take this to its logical consequence:

…..the Minister could determine that for a duct to be a “
fibre-ready facility”, it must have a minimum internal diameter (with a view to e
nabling the quick and efficient installation of fibre at a later date).

 

Installation in developments that are specified by the Minister of lines that are not o
ptical fibre or of facilities that are not fibre-ready would be subject to civil penalty p
rovisions under the Act. The enforcement regime will apply to both carriers and 
on-carriers, consistent with application of the Act. 

 

The Bill also amends Part 6 of the Act, which deals with industry codes and 

standards, to more readily enable the development of industry codes and standards 

relating to fibre optic lines and related facilities, and to give further examples of the 

types of topics which industry codes or standards might cover. In addition to 

providing necessary guidance on relevant technical matters, these measures respond 

to calls from stakeholders for such guidance to promote nationally consistent network 

and service outcomes. 


You may not a agree with their policy (actually I do agree), but you must at least admire the political style of being consistent and practical in implementation,


.

FacebookDiggStumbleUponShare

About Herman

Herman Wagter is one of the founders and co-editor of Dadamotive. His work as interim manager and consultant (Citynet Amsterdam/Fiber-to-the-Home, Platform Sustainable Mobility) has involved him directly in the impact of hyperconnectivity and sustainability on society. As an independent agent and "mobile warrior" he has experienced the pro's and con's of how organizations and projects can be structured, and what the effects on the final result can be. In his opinion we are entering an era of profound change, driven by these fundamental forces. Following the trends, discovering the fun and debunking the half-truths is a passion he likes to share with others.
Posted in: Hyperconnectivity.

Leave a Reply