If a government is determined to get a (fiber-based) Next Generation Network in its country it should take the necessary steps. Talk is cheap, actions speak loudly.
The Aussies give the right example. The Australian Government has introduced a bill which effectively enforces (with penalties) fiber access networks for new buildings. Not just greenfields but all types of new developments, including greenfield (broadacre) estates, urban infill and urban renewal projects. Its either fiber with open access provisions, or a “fibre-ready facility” with open access.
The Bill will apply whether the real estate development project is intended to
establish building lots, or building units, or both, for either sale or lease. The fibreconnection requirement will not apply to lines that are not intended to provide acarriage service to the public (e.g. it will not apply to private networks) or that are notwholly or primarily for use by an end-user at the end user’s premises (e.g. it will notapply to a line connecting to a mobile phone tower).
To ensure that carriers are able to gain access to the fibre-ready facilities installed inaccordance with the fibre-ready infrastructure requirement, the Bill provides for theestablishment in later regulations of an access regime that would require third partyaccess to those facilities to be given.
And they take this to its logical consequence:
…..the Minister could determine that for a duct to be a “fibre-ready facility”, it must have a minimum internal diameter (with a view to enabling the quick and efficient installation of fibre at a later date).
Installation in developments that are specified by the Minister of lines that are not optical fibre or of facilities that are not fibre-ready would be subject to civil penalty provisions under the Act. The enforcement regime will apply to both carriers andon-carriers, consistent with application of the Act.
The Bill also amends Part 6 of the Act, which deals with industry codes andstandards, to more readily enable the development of industry codes and standardsrelating to fibre optic lines and related facilities, and to give further examples of thetypes of topics which industry codes or standards might cover. In addition toproviding necessary guidance on relevant technical matters, these measures respondto calls from stakeholders for such guidance to promote nationally consistent networkand service outcomes.
You may not a agree with their policy (actually I do agree), but you must at least admire the political style of being consistent and practical in implementation,
.













