The trouble with wifi

I do not think the designers of wifi ever have envisioned the proliferation of access points. 

The standard implementation is not particularly suited to a situation where many access points see each other.  
A high level of adjacent “noise” is interpreted as a signal, as a consequence the “listen-before-talk” protocol lowers the effective throughput up to zero. The AD-converters have a limited dynamic range so increasing the signal strenght of an emittor to overcome “noise” does not work very well (oversteering).
Where does that hurt you? In a densely populated city like Amsterdam.  

wifi_in_amsterdam.jpg

See this scan of SSID’s (Apple Airport) in a flat:  37 access points are visible (of which still 6 are open without encryption) for 13 channels max.
Luckily my friend has a 801.n router (5 GHz), otherwise he would suffer like others that see a strong wifi signal (“5 bars”) but have no throughput. But it is still only a matter of time before the 5 Ghz band shows the same problem.
A new design is needed, derived from mesh technology to cope with this. 
(Thanks Bram)
FacebookDiggStumbleUponShare

About Herman

Herman Wagter is one of the founders and co-editor of Dadamotive. His work as interim manager and consultant (Citynet Amsterdam/Fiber-to-the-Home, Platform Sustainable Mobility) has involved him directly in the impact of hyperconnectivity and sustainability on society. As an independent agent and "mobile warrior" he has experienced the pro's and con's of how organizations and projects can be structured, and what the effects on the final result can be. In his opinion we are entering an era of profound change, driven by these fundamental forces. Following the trends, discovering the fun and debunking the half-truths is a passion he likes to share with others.
Posted in: Hyperconnectivity.

Leave a Reply